Originally Posted by
TheHoarseWhisperer
Is there a reason you decided on a full year? I wouldn't have thought there are any maps, even among the greats, that take more than six months to create.
THW
Good question. This is something that came up in discussion when we were planning this challenge. I'll just quote at length the rationale behind the extended timeline.
The reasoning is twofold. First, it would allow cartographers ample time to create their masterpieces. A lot of A-list cartographers will periodically enter a monthly challenge but fail to complete their entry due to the demands of life and the time constraints of the challenge. This would allow them to work at their own pace. Second, I think it would actually encourage a much higher turnout then we usually get for the monthly challenges. Having such a long timeline allows returning members or new members who join the Guild latter in the year to participate. If we posted the challenge with a shorter time-frame say at the beginning or end of the year, we might miss out on entries from some of these returning or new members.
Originally Posted by
chick
This is certainly a nice idea. The only problem I see is that not much will happen until Dec 30th, when everyone will suddenly post whatever map they think is the best one they've done this year. There is really nothing that makes it a "challenge", but rather just a vote on who did the nicest map in 2015.
Perhaps. I guess we'll find out won't we. However even if this turns out to be the case I don't see why voting on "who did the nicest map in 2015" isn't still a challenge; wouldn't the challenge then just be to come up with the best map of the year? In any case this is all still very new and so there's a learning curb. At the end of the year I'm sure we'll evaluate how the competition went and what, if anything, we may wish to change about the annual challenge format for the following year.
Cheers,
-Arsheesh