Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: How many mountains is too many? ^^;

  1. #11
    Guild Member Mapsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    75

    Default

    I think "wouldn't it be cool if..." is a totally valid way to approach creating a map.

    One thing to think about is who, in your world, is drawing this map, and how much do they know about the places they're mapping? A lot of things that might seem geomorphologically implausible if we assume high accuracy can make sense as a stylized way of representing something the mapmaker doesn't know much about. For example, the roundish blob of mountains in the southwest isn't something we see on the real earth -- mountains are usually in linear ranges -- but if all the mapmaker knew was that this land had mountains in the middle of it, that's a fair way to draw it. If this is for an RPG you can even work that into the campaign -- some areas may get "clarified" once the PCs actually go there.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Confutus View Post
    As it should. 8) Clearly resupplied with meltwater from those undoubtedly glacier-clad mountains to the north, keeping its water cold and fresh.
    Oh they are, it's very cold up there :)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mapsburgh View Post
    I think "wouldn't it be cool if..." is a totally valid way to approach creating a map.

    One thing to think about is who, in your world, is drawing this map, and how much do they know about the places they're mapping? A lot of things that might seem geomorphologically implausible if we assume high accuracy can make sense as a stylized way of representing something the mapmaker doesn't know much about. For example, the roundish blob of mountains in the southwest isn't something we see on the real earth -- mountains are usually in linear ranges -- but if all the mapmaker knew was that this land had mountains in the middle of it, that's a fair way to draw it. If this is for an RPG you can even work that into the campaign -- some areas may get "clarified" once the PCs actually go there.
    Hi hi. Well just as long as I don't completely bypass all laws of nature ^^' It is for my DnD campaign and while that might give me a bit of leeway I want it to be as accurate as possible! Just how impossible is it for something like that to occur? Could, for example, 3 continental plates crash together to form something like this? The area is a big source of raw magic but I don't want to use magic as an excuse to just do whatever - I want to use magic as a flavour for worldbuilding but not the building blocks!

  3. #13

    Default

    In the XKCD What If? section there was a bit that delved into the topography of Mars and how it would change as the water level rose that might be a bit interesting along with this topic.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mapsburgh View Post
    I think "wouldn't it be cool if..." is a totally valid way to approach creating a map.

    One thing to think about is who, in your world, is drawing this map, and how much do they know about the places they're mapping? A lot of things that might seem geomorphologically implausible if we assume high accuracy can make sense as a stylized way of representing something the mapmaker doesn't know much about. For example, the roundish blob of mountains in the southwest isn't something we see on the real earth -- mountains are usually in linear ranges -- but if all the mapmaker knew was that this land had mountains in the middle of it, that's a fair way to draw it. If this is for an RPG you can even work that into the campaign -- some areas may get "clarified" once the PCs actually go there.
    Wouldn't mountains the Ahaggar Mountains be a good model for the blob of mountains.

  5. #15

    Default

    That map looks awesome.

  6. #16

    Default

    I'm back on this map after working on a couple of other projects. Thoughts on how much of this is inaccurate as far as mountains go? This is going to be an area affected by magic but I want to know what obeys our rules and what would be obeying magical rules :')

    Screenshot 2020-09-02 at 15.10.59.png

  7. #17

    Default

    Realism would depend a bit on the scale. If this is a relatively small island, it's perfectly reasonable to have a bunch of mountains more or less centered in the middle. If, on the other hand, it's a 3000 km wide continent, a huge mountainous plateau in the middle would need some very specific geologic conditions in order to arise naturally.

  8. #18

    Default

    Honestly it does a decent job of replicating the terrain characteristics of Hawaii's Big Island (at least from memory of driving around it).

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrBragg View Post
    Realism would depend a bit on the scale. If this is a relatively small island, it's perfectly reasonable to have a bunch of mountains more or less centered in the middle. If, on the other hand, it's a 3000 km wide continent, a huge mountainous plateau in the middle would need some very specific geologic conditions in order to arise naturally.
    So I still need to work out my scale properly - thats a whole other learning curve - but I can say it's big. Like... 1000miles? ^^'

  10. #20
    Guild Expert Greason Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tigard (and Florence) Oregon
    Posts
    1,772

    Default

    Based on that scale, your mountains look as though they cover more area than the Himalayas. Not necessarily a bad thing, just something to consider. Artistically speaking I do like the way they look.
    GW

    One's worth is not measured by stature, alone. By heart and honor is One's true value weighed.

    Current Non-challenge WIP : Beyond Sosnasib
    Current Lite Challenge WIP : None
    Current Main Challenge WIP : None
    Completed Maps : Various Challenges

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •