data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bca/c2bca0d075b28c03704a1cc6a90e9c975943f32c" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
Magrathean
Sonora/Arizona-style desert totally makes sense. You're right about that. And yes, the Heartlands used to be just about the most fertile terrain on Lleimilla (well, as fertile as the rest of the inhabitable places). Magic did that.
As for the peninsulae, they're natural in the storyline of my campaign. I hadn't thought about them being cluttered with mountains, but it actually looks good and makes the weather make sense, as I said on my previous post. That said, I think we can rethink them without too much trouble: the region is indeed at the boundary between tectonic plates and formed by plate collision, but, since it's a coastal region with a lot of water and a relatively deep seafloor, the mountain range resulting from the collision is mostly underwater, with the islands and some of the peninsulae being those mountain peaks that are actually tall enough to protrude above the ocean surface (like all the islands Micronesia and Polynesia in the southern Pacific). Some of the peninsulae, like the one farthest south (the one you left without mountains), could have already existed and therefore only new mountains formed on already existing land. I think that fits with the current mountain pattern as well as with the story.
Fjords actually makes sense as well, but then we'd have to reduce the amount of mountains. I recently fell madly and hopelessly in love with Norway, and my favourite character from that campaign actually comes from that region, so if you can turn it into a fjord you'll be my hero. Otherwise, we can stick with the tectonic-collision idea.
Thanks again for all the hard work.