View Poll Results: Which grid type do you prefer?

Voters
35. You may not vote on this poll
  • Square. I prefer 90 degree angles and slightly longer diagonals.

    13 37.14%
  • Staggered Square. Diagonals aren't a problem anymore.

    2 5.71%
  • Hex. 6 sides worth of facing and movement.

    10 28.57%
  • None. I don't need no stinkin' grid.

    14 40.00%
  • Other. Have you ever seen this grid before?

    1 2.86%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Questions of the Grid

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Artisan su_liam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Port Alberta, Regina(IRL: Eugene, OR)
    Posts
    798

    Post

    I voted for none, but I'm not averse to a graticule for some purposes. Hex is just too unnatural for a map in my opinion; it just kind of shouts, "game map," to me(although I might use hex for an alien map). Staggered squares is just poor man's hex.

    After doing miniature gaming for awhile, I don't find the use of rulers(or protractors or even retroactive encabulators) to be excessively onerous, although I find I prefer to let the computer work out line of sight.

  2. #2
    Community Leader RPMiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Watching you from in here
    Posts
    3,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by su_liam View Post
    I voted for none, but I'm not averse to a graticule for some purposes. Hex is just too unnatural for a map in my opinion; it just kind of shouts, "game map," to me(although I might use hex for an alien map). Staggered squares is just poor man's hex.
    Yea, staggered square is the answer to those that use squares simply because they need orthogonal lines.
    Last edited by RPMiller; 05-08-2008 at 04:13 PM.
    Bill Stickers is innocent! It isn't Bill's fault that he was hanging out in the wrong place.

    Please make an effort to tag all threads. This will greatly enhance the usability of the forums.



  3. #3

  4. #4
    Guild Member Chgowiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Northern Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    68

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by su_liam View Post
    After doing miniature gaming for awhile, I don't find the use of rulers(or protractors or even retroactive encabulators) to be excessively onerous, although I find I prefer to let the computer work out line of sight.
    Oh, that brings back memories of Battletech games. There used to be some tool that a guy had for LOS and figuring out range if we didn't have hex maps. It wasn't a rule, but it had markings to represent LAM range, MG, rail guns...

    Now I'm suddenly craving a Jenner vs. Phawk fight...

    Neurowiz

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •