Hello!

[Deadshade]

.

I have checked out Wilbur in the past, and found it completely baffling, but do enjoy fractal terrains, I've used that as well and thought it was pretty neat.

Hehe I qualified Wilbur more neutrally as "having a steep Learning curve"
Yet if you are stubborn enough to invest time in it and keep on learning, you obtain a very flexible and powerfull mapping program. The only thing it lacks is a good texturing/coloring module. That's why it generally needs postedition with Gimp.
In any case there is nobody and Nothing that can do better rivers than Wilbur.

[kacey]

Hehe I qualified Wilbur more neutrally as "having a steep Learning curve"
Yet if you are stubborn enough to invest time in it and keep on learning, you obtain a very flexible and powerfull mapping program. The only thing it lacks is a good texturing/coloring module. That's why it generally needs postedition with Gimp.
In any case there is nobody and Nothing that can do better rivers than Wilbur.

Steep learning curve lol I thought gimp had a steep learning curve, and PhotoShop. I've spent several years playing around with them, and still feel I've only scratched the surface. Tho I might have to check out Wilbur again as I'm having tons of trouble trying to figure out rivers, mind you I haven't made it past finishing mountains on any map that I've started so I think I'll start there.