Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: [WIP] Kervria Regional map

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Journeyer eepjr24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Some progress made, I think I am done with rivers for the moment.

    kervria_rivers.jpg

  2. #2
    Guild Journeyer eepjr24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    A good bit of progress in adding the mountains. I will need to tweak some of the river paths, but I expected it and it should not be a big deal to do. Would love to hear thoughts on realism or any critiques.

    mountains_fixed.jpg

    - E

  3. #3
    Guild Apprentice Blindkingofbohemia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Titirangi, Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Hey, this looks cool. Just looking at the mountains I think you could get them looking somewhat more real: at the moment they look as though they run along a fault line between tectonic plates, which is good: mountains run in ridges. Besides running in ridges, though, mountains build up over time and in ranges. If you look at (for example) a satellite map of New Zealand's South Island you will see that instead of a single long ridge a mountain range is made up of several parallel ridges of greater and lower height. I think adding that kind of depth to your mountains would help to make this map more realistic.

    Also consider that mountain ridges don't necessarily run in the same direction as the range itself: mountains are formed by a slow motion but ultimately very violent process. They are bits of crust broken and forced up into the sky, not gently shoved into place. Looking again at the South Island you will note that the mountain range (the Southern Alps) runs roughly southwest to northeast, along the tectonic margin. The ridges or massifs that make up the range, though, run across its general grain, often from the southeast to northwest.

    So I think if you take a look at your mountains and look at a) building them out from ridges into ranges and b) making sure the ridges flow in varied (but broadly consistent) directions sometimes opposed to the overall orientation of the range, you will have a much more realistic map. Then we will look at weathering: those two processes are basically how you get foothills and highlands around your mountains, anyway.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •