Quote Originally Posted by jshoer View Post
Cool!

The only thing that spoils the attention to detail for me is Saturn's rings - their inclination is not that high! Also, if you're including named KBOs, Ceres' and Pallas' absence from the main belt is conspicuous. You could also include the Jupiter Trojans and some prominent comets, but that would of course add to all the data you're already including.
Oops. I remember contemplating putting rings around Saturn, but I had already drawn its moons and they would have conflicted. Lol. I was trying to be accurate, then totally skewed Saturn's rings!

I haven't heard of Pallas, but Ceres is in the Asteroid Belt, between Jupiter and Mars.

I considered drawing comet paths but felt the map was too crowded, especially around the inner planets. Those are some good suggestions, though.

Quote Originally Posted by jshoer View Post
Stylistically, the only things that stick out to me are that the "portolan" lines might look better if they were a darker gray, and I think I might like the asteroid and Kuiper belts better if they were represented as more stylized bands than with dots. (Yes, I know, this is an ironic comment given my current project!)
Drat! That would have made the belts look so much better. Concentric circles, each getting finer as it moves out... It is finished now. But I will have to keep that in mind. I am planning on doing a solar map for my world, Irania (from which most of my maps are derived).

Quote Originally Posted by jshoer View Post
Don't worry, I'm nitpicking this because I like it a lot. It reminds me of the Tabletop Whale solar system map, in a really good way! Thanks for sharing and I'm looking forward to more!
That's okay. I like your suggestions. For the record that is the map that prompted me to finally get to this project. Lol.

Thanks for your input!