Reply With Quote
2 is a better scale but 1 matches the style of the mountains better.
Hello. A little update on this project. I'm undecided on the choice of the forests. I have a preference but I would like to know your opinion before going more forward in the drawing.
### Latest Wip ###
2 is a better scale but 1 matches the style of the mountains better.
Artstation - | - Buy Me a Kofi
I like #1 the best by far. #4 also has potential.
I think two fits the scale better and intergrates with the mountains well. Nice job
Yeah, I also agree with 1 and 4. You could probably use both, for different forests and mix things up a bit. Looks great either way!
I agree with you Snodsy, this type of forest integrates better with the mountains and fits the scale, but it troubles me for the style. I don't know how to adapt it...Originally Posted by snodsy
Thanks Goombac. Mixing all the different trees and the density was in my intent. Hope it will work.
Thanks Diamond and J. I'll adapt the 1 with some elements of the 4. My last intent was for the five but yours opinions make me change my point of view.
Thanks all.
Well, try doing a small clump of trees as style 5 and let us see what that looks like.
Where the trees are closer together. Maybe that is what is throwing off the look of #5 - that they're too spread out.
Artstation - | - Buy Me a Kofi
For me it is 2 and 4 but you decided alreadyWill look good whatever you do
I'm allergic to pollen! - Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Yup 1 and 4 fit the style better. Maybe try to not draw too much hatching lines for the trees drop shadow, that might be a bit heavy with a full forest.
Thanks J., Barek and Max for the advice. It takes me much time to finish drawing all the forest. I have to find a quicker method to do it in the future.
There's my new update. Many things to do before the end.
Comments, advices, critics, all are welcome.
### Latest Wip ###
Posting Permissions
