Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 151

Thread: How to get your rivers in the right place

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Journeyer Ryan K's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewas5372 View Post
    Texas is a bad example of lake formation, unless you have a race of sentient beavers in your fantasy world.
    I read that and I think 'dwarves'
    Regards,

    RK

  2. #2
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,245
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Absolutely ! This thread is about natural rivers and the long term state of them (and on a non magical earth like planet too). Post flood and tsunami... well almost anything goes. Then in the medium time span there is this braiding and some extreme cases of meandering then longer still you might have oddities from glaciers periodically freezing and thawing in multi decade cycles but generally, in the long term, the idea that rivers don't fork and exit into the sea in one spot holds true. I guess if considered long enough then any river system is dynamic enough that there is no stable state for it but for the maps we make here that's not really applicable.

  3. #3
    Mixail
    Guest

    Default

    Well, I joined just for these tutorials

  4. #4

    Default

    edit: I'll just make a thread about this because people probably don't look at these stickied threads much.

    Question: Soil around rivers tends to be fertile right? So when making maps of fictional areas I always have a tendency to put a bunch of trees next to the rivers, and some forests sometimes, especially in an area where 2 or more rivers are relatively close to each other and lakes because the river is dumping all the soil nutrients there in the lake, so the soil around it would probably be fertile enough to support a forest. I'm always having a hard time over whether the soil around rivers is fertile, and if it is, what kind of vegetation i should put along side it, and also where to put forests in general. I gathered that they are usually next to mountains, because they trap moist air/rainclouds. Any good rules of thumb?
    Last edited by s0meguy; 04-08-2012 at 02:54 PM.

  5. #5
    Guild Novice Neorael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Santiago de Chile
    Posts
    6

    Default

    I wanted to thank you all. Every part of this topic has something to contribute in the learning of how the hydric sistem operates

  6. #6

    Default

    The alluvial plain near a lowland river tends to be very fertile because the soil around it is regularly exchanged. While the "Fertile Crescent" eventually wore out and suffered from desertification due to overfarming, the Nile's flood plain, particularly the delta area, remained fruitful through thousands of years of continuous farming. The primary difference was that the Nile floods regularly, which refreshes the nutrients in the soil. The Tigris and Euphrates flood plains have remained fertile, but not to the same extent because their flooding is less reliable. The rest of the land in that area was merely irrigated from the rivers and did not receive the benefit of the floods. As a result, the nutrients were depleted, salt levels rose, and the desert claimed what was once very good farmland.

    More obviously, of course, vegetation tends to be thicker around rivers because that's where the water is! In the American Great Plains (where I grew up), the tall grasses will grow everywhere, but you only naturally find trees near the rivers because the rest of the land just doesn't have enough moisture to support them. Trees planted far from the rivers tend to be rather sickly, and they often fall down during windstorms. Typically on someone's car.
    Bryan Ray, visual effects artist
    http://www.bryanray.name

  7. #7
    Guild Member Facebook Connected Gumboot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Midgardsormr View Post
    The alluvial plain near a lowland river tends to be very fertile because the soil around it is regularly exchanged. While the "Fertile Crescent" eventually wore out and suffered from desertification due to overfarming, the Nile's flood plain, particularly the delta area, remained fruitful through thousands of years of continuous farming. The primary difference was that the Nile floods regularly, which refreshes the nutrients in the soil. The Tigris and Euphrates flood plains have remained fertile, but not to the same extent because their flooding is less reliable. The rest of the land in that area was merely irrigated from the rivers and did not receive the benefit of the floods. As a result, the nutrients were depleted, salt levels rose, and the desert claimed what was once very good farmland.

    More obviously, of course, vegetation tends to be thicker around rivers because that's where the water is! In the American Great Plains (where I grew up), the tall grasses will grow everywhere, but you only naturally find trees near the rivers because the rest of the land just doesn't have enough moisture to support them. Trees planted far from the rivers tend to be rather sickly, and they often fall down during windstorms. Typically on someone's car.

    You're quite right, although trees don't grow where rivers are, as such. Rather both trees and rivers tend to end up in areas of high rainfall. Water in a river isn't much use to a tree, because trees don't grow in rivers. But rivers tend to flow where there's more rainfall. Trees get their water mostly from rainwater falling on the ground where they're standing. The water that isn't absorbed by trees ends up in rivers.

    Generally speaking:

    Higher rainfall = more trees + more rivers
    Lower rainfall = less trees + less rivers

  8. #8
    Software Dev/Rep Hai-Etlik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    48° 28′ N 123° 8′ W
    Posts
    1,333
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gumboot View Post
    You're quite right, although trees don't grow where rivers are, as such. Rather both trees and rivers tend to end up in areas of high rainfall. Water in a river isn't much use to a tree, because trees don't grow in rivers. But rivers tend to flow where there's more rainfall. Trees get their water mostly from rainwater falling on the ground where they're standing. The water that isn't absorbed by trees ends up in rivers.

    Generally speaking:

    Higher rainfall = more trees + more rivers
    Lower rainfall = less trees + less rivers
    Actually on the great plains it is the rivers directly allowing the trees to grow, they aggregate the water, and bring in water from rainier areas, which allows the trees to grow in the river valleys despite not having any more rain than the surrounding plains.

  9. #9
    Guild Member Facebook Connected Elothan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    81

    Default

    I have collected a bit of the information in this thread and some more in a pdf. I made it for my own use, but if anybody wants it to read off line I`d be happy to share it
    It is mostly just copy paste from the forums (with credits and links to the contributors, so nothing really fancy.
    But if it is ok, just ask and i will put it up

  10. #10
    Community Leader Guild Sponsor Gidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    3,673

    Default

    Go ahead and post it up, pdf collations are always welcome.

Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •