Reply With QuoteCan you post an image illustrating this? Frankly, when I read about how something looks, I can never properly visualize it in my head.
Vertical exaggeration in cave maps.
Hello all.
I'm in the process of working on some maps of a world spanning cave network and I've come across an issue with scaling. Any lateral (cut away) map showing the caves on a planetary scale cannot show depth in any meaningful way. Is it considered okay in such maps to use 'vertical exaggeration'? In other words, can I use a different scale for up/down compared to east/west? I'm thinking of something along the lines of 1px = 10km (east/west) and 1px = 10m (up/down) for large scale maps and only going to a 1:1 ratio for small scale maps.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Last edited by Thurlor; 04-14-2011 at 12:50 AM. Reason: Corrections
Can you post an image illustrating this? Frankly, when I read about how something looks, I can never properly visualize it in my head.
Blog: Too much game lore? | Diablo 3 guest passes
Riftforge: (WIP) Map of Rift Isle, protected by elite raiders ( Play now }
I think shading things is another good way to show depth, the higher levels are lighter and the lower levels are darker.
This is a very rough concept sketch, and even with vertical exaggeration there is scaling issues, but it gets the idea across I think. It represents 40,000km from east to west (circumference of the world) and 20km depth.
Desert Sink Hole.jpg
I feel I should point out that this is all aimed at creating a map for the current challenge.
That works for me! Even is things like Google earth they provide a vertical scale parameter so you can exaggerate verticality and better appreciate elevation changes.Originally Posted by Thurlor
-Rob A>
My tutorials: Using GIMP to Create an Artistic Regional Map ~ All My Tutorials
My GIMP Scripts: Rotating Brush ~ Gradient from Image ~ Mosaic Tile Helper ~ Random Density Map ~ Subterranean Map Prettier ~ Tapered Stroke Path ~ Random Rotate Floating Layer ~ Batch Image to Pattern ~ Better Seamless Tiles ~ Tile Shuffle ~ Scale Pattern ~ Grid of Guides ~ Fractalize path ~ Label Points
My Maps: Finished Maps ~ Challenge Entries ~ My Portfolio: www.cartocopia.com
I think that the 2:1 ratio works well, just be sure to keep the elevations of mountains, etc. to the same scale as those caverns down below.
BOB
We do not stop playing because we grow old.
We grow old because we stop playing.
www.dragonslayers-society.org
That's 2,000:1
-Rob A>
My GIMP Scripts: Rotating Brush ~ Gradient from Image ~ Mosaic Tile Helper ~ Random Density Map ~ Subterranean Map Prettier ~ Tapered Stroke Path ~ Random Rotate Floating Layer ~ Batch Image to Pattern ~ Better Seamless Tiles ~ Tile Shuffle ~ Scale Pattern ~ Grid of Guides ~ Fractalize path ~ Label Points
My Maps: Finished Maps ~ Challenge Entries ~ My Portfolio: www.cartocopia.com
Actually, it's 1000:1
Chuckles so math is not a strong point. As long as it is consistent.
BOB
We do not stop playing because we grow old.
We grow old because we stop playing.
www.dragonslayers-society.org
Doh! I was using the image dimension, not the map scale!
-Rob A>
My GIMP Scripts: Rotating Brush ~ Gradient from Image ~ Mosaic Tile Helper ~ Random Density Map ~ Subterranean Map Prettier ~ Tapered Stroke Path ~ Random Rotate Floating Layer ~ Batch Image to Pattern ~ Better Seamless Tiles ~ Tile Shuffle ~ Scale Pattern ~ Grid of Guides ~ Fractalize path ~ Label Points
My Maps: Finished Maps ~ Challenge Entries ~ My Portfolio: www.cartocopia.com
Posting Permissions
